❦ Body ❦ Craft ❦ Knowledge ❦ Activation
Continue reading “Ukrainian Dance in International Context – Panel 29 January 2027”“Dance heritage will help us collect the stories that reflect this nation. Coming to Ukraine from the West made me realise how little I knew about the country and how much there still is for us to learn.”
Udance — Forum “Танцплан України 2026”
Type: Presentation
Date: 26 June 2026
Context: International Conference Pina Bausch – From Ritual to Romance, Bergische Universität Wuppertal
Institution: Pina Bausch Foundation
Role: Presenter / Researcher
Speakers / Moderation:
Ricardo Viviani
Isabelle Charnavel
Laura Wiemer — Moderator
This presentation reflected on ten years of Oral History work at the Pina Bausch Archives and on the experiences accumulated through working with dancers and collaborators of Tanztheater. The material considered how oral testimony can bring aspects of artistic experience, memory and professional life into historical documentation.
Drawing on approximately seventy interviews, the presentation addressed questions arising from the documentation of dance as a lived and embodied practice. It considered testimonies in relation to artistic processes, formation, cultural encounters and personal histories, and examined what such accounts can contribute to the understanding of Tanztheater.
The contribution was presented within the conference section Epistemologies and Forms, placing the experience of a long-term Oral History collection in dialogue with other approaches to knowledge in and through dance.
Archival Material:
Presentation material; conference documentation; presentation photograph; related Oral History documentation.
Type: Presentation
Date: 5 May 2026
Context: II International Scientific and Practical Conference “Personality as a Space for Challenge and Formation of Culture”
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine
Institution / Organisation: National University of Physical Education and Sport of Ukraine (NUPESU)
Role: Presenter
Status: Conference Abstract / Public Record
Embodied Personality in the National Cultural Space This presentation examines how embodied personality functions as a national cultural space in which values, memories, and artistic genealogies are formed and transmitted. Drawing on my practice as a dance artist and oral historian, I consider how verbal historical records can emerge from non-logocentric, embodied processes, and how such approaches reveal relationships between subjectivity, social environments, and cultural memory.
Continue reading “Embodied Personality – at II Personality as a Space for Challenge and Formation of Culture Conference”
Ricardo Viviani – Foto: Solomiia Kozolup
In December 2025, I traveled to Kyiv for a workshop. I spent ten days there, having traveled from Wuppertal via Kraków – a route that felt both pragmatic and existential. How does one prepare for a journey to a war zone from the comfort of a quiet living room? There are no instructions. Preparation begins with mundane tasks and packing. Fear plays no role, surprisingly enough – only the responsibility to pass on what I have developed over the past fifteen years.
I accepted the invitation of Viktor Ruban, choreographer and cultural activist, who keeps spaces open for art and thought amidst the war. The task was clear: to support Ukrainian institutions in describing, documenting, and protecting their dance traditions – an act of cultural self-assertion, a step towards decolonization from the Soviet grip that had overlaid language, culture, and memory for decades.
In Kyiv, we collaborated with directors of museums, archives, and libraries, as well as with ten artists and researchers—from twenty-somethings to people like myself who have dedicated themselves to dance for 45 years. The Goethe-Institut made this work possible through its Resilience Fund. The first day is dedicated to getting to know each other. I explain who I am, and they tell me about themselves. A room brimming with expertise—and yet filled with hesitation, because words fail us. Only when Karina, one of the participants, spontaneously begins translating each word does everything become audible. I try to understand the different urgency. Each person brings their own idea of what needs to be preserved.
What I’m experiencing is a city that is both wounded and alive. People who seem tired yet determined. Cafes that remain open even though the power might go out. Colleagues who work with humor and professionalism while sirens wail outside. A normality that isn’t an illusion, but a survival strategy.
It is necessary and urgent to do this work now. So many talented people are going to the front. A choreographer says goodbye because he is being drafted as a drone operator the next day. Dance teachers are working as snipers. One choreographer can no longer visit her hometowns near Chornobyl. And many have fallen. What remains are memories – and small Ukrainian flags at the memorial on Maidan Square.
My daily routine quickly becomes ritualized: reflecting on the previous day, conducting interviews on battery power, giving presentations. Everything is in the present. The workdays are packed. Memories surface, are sorted, put into words. But my question about a children’s song hits a wall: Soviet colonial overlays, foreign words, a legacy no longer embraced. And questions about the future? They remain untouched. The future is a space that cannot be entered in war, in this invasion. And then, one afternoon, a conversation with Nikita, twenty years old. A quiet moment, almost accidental. He says: “I don’t know how long I’ll live. But as long as I live, I want to dance.”
Here, everything converges: the human element that permeates our dance and makes its humanity visible. Nikita is at the beginning of his career, and yet his body already understands everything that will accompany him throughout his life. This almost unfathomable secret—a knowledge born of breath and movement—that we want to pass on before it vanishes again in the moment.
I work with artists, dance companies, universities, archives and cultural institutions, bringing together experience as a dancer and choreographer with many years of research, teaching and Oral History work.
You may be looking for someone who can:
My work is particularly suited to projects that need to move between practice, research, heritage and artistic creation.
Invite me to speak
Invite me to teach / mentor
Discuss an oral-history, heritage or research project
Type: Press Conference · Video Transcript Summary
Date: 23 December 2025
Context: Presentation of the results and future plans of Oral History for Dance Heritage
Location: Ukrainian Crisis Media Center, Kyiv, Ukraine
Subject: Developing a museum protocol for archiving dance
Related Workshop: Oral History for Dance Heritage, 1–6 December 2025
Speakers:
Viktor Ruban
Daryna Yakymova
Ricardo Viviani and representatives of Ukrainian museum and dance institutions, as referred to during the press conference
Press Conference: Oral History for Dance Heritage
This page presents an English summary of the transcript of a publicly available video recording of a press conference held by the Ukrainian Crisis Media Center. The conference presented the results of the Oral History for Dance Heritage project and discussed the next steps following the December 2025 workshop at the National Art Museum of Ukraine (NAMU).
The conference focused particularly on the development of a protocol through which dance could be documented and incorporated into a museum collection. Project curator Viktor Ruban described the work as part of the broader DancePlan Ukraine initiative and as a pilot approach to preserving performative arts through the integration of oral testimony, embodied knowledge and contextual information.
According to Ruban, the protocol responds to the difficulty of preserving dance through conventional museum practices. Dance is not only a performance event but also a social and cultural practice whose histories may disappear when documentation is absent. He emphasized the need to preserve testimonies, archival evidence and research in order to strengthen historical continuity and the visibility of Ukrainian dance.
Daryna Yakymova, curator at NAMU, presented the newly developed three-part protocol for archiving dance:
Yakymova explained that museums traditionally work through the preservation of material objects, while dance presents the additional challenge of preserving an ephemeral artistic form. Within the project, Oral History provided a method for extending the museum record beyond physical objects and for incorporating the knowledge and experience of the people who created and performed the work.
The press conference also emphasized the importance of Ricardo Viviani’s experience with Oral History at the Pina Bausch Foundation. His decade of work with dance practitioners was presented as an important reference for adapting Oral History to the Ukrainian context and to the specific requirements of dance heritage.
The speakers described the need for a systematic and accessible structure through which dance could be documented, researched and, where appropriate, reconstructed. In this framework, museum collection, Oral History, archival documentation and future artistic transmission become interconnected rather than separate activities.
The press conference therefore documents a concrete institutional development following the December workshop: the work moved from methodological experimentation toward the formulation of a protocol intended to allow dance to enter a museum collection as a form of cultural heritage.
Archival Material:
Video recording of the press conference; transcript summary; documentation relating to the Oral History for Dance Heritage workshop; material concerning the development of the NAMU dance-archiving protocol.
Type: Workshop · Oral History / Dance Heritage
Date: 1–6 December 2025
Context: Oral History for Dance Heritage
Location: National Art Museum of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Role: Workshop Leader · Oral Historian · Choreographer
Duration: Six-day intensive
Participants: Dance researchers and museum professionals from Ukraine
Translator: Karina Solka
Organisers: Impulse Transformation Platform · Goethe-Institut Ukraine · National Art Museum of Ukraine
Status: Historical Record
Oral History for Dance Heritage was a six-day intensive in Kyiv exploring how Oral History can contribute to the documentation, preservation and activation of dance heritage.
The workshop brought together dance researchers and museum professionals to consider the particular challenges of documenting an ephemeral art form. It connected artistic experience, Oral History, cultural memory and museum practice within the Ukrainian context.
The intensive drew on more than a decade of Viviani’s work as an Oral Historian in the performing arts, together with his experience as a dancer and choreographer.
A central concern was the relationship between spoken testimony and the knowledge carried through dance. Oral History can make aspects of experience, memory and artistic lineage visible and narratable, while recognising that embodied knowledge cannot be fully contained in words. The transmission of dance heritage also takes place through embodied practice, relationships and forms of knowledge that may remain only partially articulated.
The workshop therefore approached dance heritage as both documentary material and living cultural knowledge. Questions of memory, testimony, documentation, preservation and future access were considered in relation to the specific conditions of dance and to the Ukrainian cultural context.
The workshop took place during a period in which questions of cultural memory, heritage and continuity have particular significance in Ukraine. The encounter brought international Oral History experience into dialogue with Ukrainian dance researchers, museum professionals and practitioners working within conditions shaped by war, displacement and cultural transformation.
The exchange also highlighted the importance of recognising dance as part of cultural history rather than treating it solely as an ephemeral performance practice.
The intensive formed part of a wider collaborative process concerned with the development of approaches to documenting and preserving dance heritage in Ukraine. This process contributed to the Protocol for Archiving Dance, developed in Kyiv in 2025 by Daryna Yakymova, Viktor Ruban and Ricardo Viviani.
The resulting work addresses the relationship between documentary records, Oral History, embodied knowledge and the continuing life of dance heritage. Further methodological and working materials remain part of the associated research archive.
Primary and related sources:
Official invitation dated 24 November 2025; workshop documentation; presentation materials; Oral History interviews conducted in Kyiv; Protocol for Archiving Dance, Kyiv 2025; related project documentation.
Type: Press Report · English Summary
Date: 15 December 2025
Context: Oral History for Dance Heritage, National Art Museum of Ukraine (NAMU), Kyiv
Author: Maria Kabatsii
Publication: Suspilne Kultura
Subject: Archiving Ukrainian Dance Heritage
Press Report: How NAMU Works on Archiving Ukrainian Dance
This page presents an English summary of a report by Maria Kabatsii, published by Suspilne Kultura. The journalist attended one day of the six-day intensive Oral History for Dance Heritage at the National Art Museum of Ukraine (NAMU) in Kyiv and its concluding round table. Her report documents how dance researchers, practitioners, museum workers and historians were working to develop approaches to preserving and archiving Ukrainian dance heritage. The report focuses particularly on the adaptation of Oral History to dance and on the institutional challenges involved in bringing an ephemeral art form into museum and archival practice.
The project, Oral History for Dance Heritage, was organized by the Impulse Transformation Platform with support from the Goethe-Institut in Ukraine and in partnership with NAMU. According to the report, Ricardo Viviani was invited as a lecturer and Oral History specialist from the Pina Bausch Foundation, and researchers from different Ukrainian cities worked together with museum specialists to adapt the method to the Ukrainian dance context.
Kabatsii’s report emphasizes the difficulty of documenting dance through conventional verbal or archival means. Viviani describes the challenge as creating ways to talk about dance and to help practitioners express the depth of their knowledge. The article places this question within a wider discussion of the relationship between embodied experience, memory and the documentation of dance.
The report also describes gaps in the documentation of Ukrainian dance. Historian Taras Samchuk points to dance as a comparatively neglected research field, while curator and project initiator Viktor Ruban discusses the loss of experimental dance histories that were not documented and therefore remained primarily in personal memories and private archives. The article connects these gaps with broader questions of cultural memory and identity in Ukraine.
The article places the workshop within NAMU’s recent efforts to make dance visible as an artistic medium in its own right. It refers to the museum’s earlier project “Dance in the War Zone?”, which brought contemporary dance into the museum and established a basis for subsequent collaboration between the institution and dance researchers.
A central point in the report is the development of museum approaches for preserving dance. Daryna Yakymova explains that NAMU intends to develop storage protocols for an ephemeral art form and identifies Oral History as a method that could help document and archive this heritage. She also describes the lack of specialists with specific knowledge of dance history, terminology and archival requirements within museum institutions.
The report also documents practical interview training during the workshop. Alongside the methodological discussion, participants considered the practical conditions of recording and preserving oral histories and the institutional resources required to maintain a digital archive. Viviani identifies institutional support and digital infrastructure as significant challenges and stresses the need to distinguish the documentation of dance history from the process of creating dance itself.
The article concludes by connecting the preservation of Ukrainian dance with cultural memory and identity. It presents the attempt to archive dance as relevant not only within Ukraine but also internationally, because documenting Ukrainian dance can make histories and practices that remain insufficiently known accessible to wider audiences.
Archival Material:
Press article; press photographs; workshop documentation; interview-training documentation; related project material concerning Oral History for Dance Heritage and the archiving of Ukrainian dance.